The New Family Arrangements as Overcoming Traditionalism: Pluralism and the Concretization of Fundamental Rights in Brazil

Marcos Augusto Maliska, Marilaine Moreira de Jesus

Abstract


Traditionalism is an ideology that advocates for a government founded on principles surpassing mere human and individual aspects. In traditional symbolism, the supernatural principle is invariably regarded as masculine, and that of nature as feminine. Traditionalism underscores the necessity for the family entity to acknowledge the metaphysical dyad distinguishing the masculine from the feminine, contending that the sole legitimate family form is that constituted by the union of a man and a woman and their offspring. This paper seeks to examine the shift from traditionalism to constitutional pluralism within the realm of family entities. It aims to comprehend how constitutional pluralism acknowledges the diversity of family forms and facilitates societal changes in the concept of the family, all the while circumventing state censorship and bolstering individual liberty. The approach utilised is one of normatibrave juridical enquiry. The study reveals that new family structures, rooted in constitutional pluralism, foster the displacement of traditionalism, thereby establishing a new paradigm for interpreting the concept of the family as defined by the Constitution. Traditionalism, having historically occupied a dominant stance regarding the family, yields to pluralism. The realisation of fundamental rights ensures the diversity of family entities, inclusive of the traditional family's rightful claim to existence. Viewed from the vantage point of a pluralistic family constitutional framework, traditionalism should not be perceived as antagonistic to pluralism but rather as one of its valid manifestations a legitimate approach to experiencing life and perceiving the world.


Keywords


family; pluralism; traditionalism; fundamental rights

Full Text:

PDF

References


Benjamin R. Teitelbaum. Guerra pela Eternidade. O retorno do tradicionalismo e a ascensão da direita populista. Campinas: Ed. Unicap, 2020.

Benzies, Karen, dan Richelle Mychasiuk. “Fostering Family Resiliency: A Review of the Key Protective Factors.” Child & Family Social Work 14, no. 1 (2009): 103–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2008.00586.x.

Caenegem, Raoul C. van. Uma introdução histórica ao Direito Privado. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2000.

Cecília P. Grosman and Irene Martinez Alacorta. Famílias Ensambladas, nuevas uniones despuís del divorcio. Buenos Aires: Editorial Universidad, 2000.

Cordi, Cassiano. “O tradicionalismo na República Velha.” PhD Dissertation, Universidade Gama Filho, 1984.

Cristiano Chaves de Farias and Nelson Rosenvald. Curso de direito civil: famílias. 10 ed. Salvador: Ed. JusPodivm, 2018.

Dias, Tainah. “A defesa da família tradicional e a perpetuação dos papéis de gênero naturalizados.” Mandrágora 23 (30 Juni 2017): 49. https://doi.org/10.15603/2176-0985/mandragora.v23n1p51-72.

Dimas Messias de Carvalho. Direito das Famílias. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2015.

Ernest Hambloch. Sua Majestade o Presidente do Brasil: um estudo do Brasil constitucional: 1889-1934. Brasília: Senado Federal, 2000.

Evola, Julius. A Metafísica do Sexo. Porto: Afrodite, 1976.

———. Cavalcare la tigre. Orientamenti esistenziali per un’epoca della dissoluzione. 5 ed. Roma: Edizioni Mediterranee, 1995.

———. Revolta contra o mundo moderno. Lisboa: Publicações Dom Quixote, 1989.

Fachin, Luiz Edson. Teoria crítica do direito civil. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2012.

Francisco C. de San Tiago Dantas. Direito de família e de sucessões. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 1991.

Guénon, René. A Crise do Mundo Moderno. São Paulo: Clube do Taró, 2007.

———. Oriente e Occidente. Translated by Pietro Nutrizio. Milão: Oriental Press, 2005.

Häberle, Peter. “Staatskirchenrecht als Religionsrecht der verfassten Gesellschaft.” Dalam Verfassung als öffentlicher Prozess. Materialien zu einer Verfassungstheorie der offenen Gesellschaft, 3 ed. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1998.

———. Verfassungsinterpretation als öffentlicher Prozess. In. Verfassung als öffentlicher Prozess. Materialien zu einer Verfassungstheorie der offenen Gesellschaft. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1998.

———. “Zur gegenwärtigen Diskussion um das Problem der Souveränität.” Dalam Verfassung als öffentlicher Prozess. Materialien zu einer Verfassungstheorie der offenen Gesellschaft., 3 ed. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1998.

HESSE, Konrad. A força normativa da Constituição. Tradução de Gilmar Ferreira Mendes. Porto Alegre: Fabris, 1991.

Julius Evola. Revolt Against the Modern World. United State: Inner Traditions, 1995.

Justus Friedrich Runde. Grundsätze des gemeinen deutschen Privatrechts. Göttingen: Dieterich, 1817.

Maliska, Marcos Augosto. Fundamentos da Constituição. Abertura. Cooperação. Integração. Curitiba: Juruá Editora, 2013.

Marcos Augusto Maliska. Pluralismo Jurídico e Direito Moderno. Notas para Pensar a Racionalidade Jurídica. Curitiba: Juruá, 2022.

Martonio Mont´Alverne Barreto Lima. “Art. 1o, V – Pluralismo político.” Dalam Comentários à Constituição do Brasil. São Paulo: Saraiva/Almedina, 2013.

Mons. João Scognamiglio Clá Dias. O Dom de Sabedoria na mente, vida e obra de Plínio Corrêa de Oliveira. Vítima Explanatória. São Paulo: Instituto Lumen Sapientiae, 2016.

Otto von Gierke. Deutsches Privatrecht. Erster Band. Allgemeiner Teil und Personenrecht. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 1895.

Pedersen, Daphne E. “The Family: A World History.” The Social Science Journal 51, no. 4 (1 Desember 2014): 692–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2014.09.011.

Perlingieri, Pietro. Perfis do direito civil: introdução ao direito civil constitucional. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2002.

Sérgio Rezende de Barros,. Direitos Humanos da Família. São Paulo: Imago, 2003.

Toikko, Timo, Piia Seppälä, Laura Häkkilä, dan Juulia Hietamäki. “Family Support Services Buffer the Effect of Child Welfare Notifications on Child Removals.” Child & Family Social Work 28, no. 2 (2023): 372–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12969.

Walker, Neil. “Constitutional Pluralism Revisited.” SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY, 5 Mei 2016. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2775820.

———. “The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism.” The Modern Law Review 65, no. 3 (2002): 317–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00383.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/as-siyasi.v3i2.17969

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Marcos Augusto Maliska, Marilaine Moreira de Jesus

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0